Goffman, Parsons, and the Negational Self

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7336/academicus.2015.11.01

Abstract

Erving Goffman’s emphasis on impression management in everyday life means that for the most part persons offer only partial or incomplete glimpses of themselves. Indeed, under specifiable conditions self-presentations may take the form of a negational self. If negational selves exist at the person or individual level, then they must also exist at the collective level (that is, if we are to take seriously such notions as the social mind, collective representations, or even culture). Understandings of how this negational self appears and is produced at various analytical levels (micro, meso, and macro) can be anchored via a conceptual schema which merges Goffman’s own identity typology with the three-world model of Jürgen Habermas by way of Talcott Parsons.

Keywords:

negational self, indentity, Goffman, Parsons, Habermas, self, me and I, three worlds theory

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Appiah, K. Anthony. 1994. “Identity, Authenticity, Survival: Multicultural Societies and Social Reproduction.” Pp. 149-163 in Multiculturalism, edited by A. Gutmann. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  2. Baumeister, Roy F. 1998. “The Self.” Pp. 680-740 in Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 1, edited by D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  3. Bendle, Mervyn F. 2002. “The Crisis of ‘Identity’ in High Modernity.” British Journal of Sociology 53 (1):1-18.

  4. Berger, Peter L. 1974. “Modern Identity: Crisis and Continuity.” Pp. in The Cultural Drama: Modern Identities and Social Ferment, edited by W.S. Dillon. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

  5. Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Doubleday.

  6. Bradbury, Malcolm, Bryan Heading, and Martin Hollis. 1972. “The Man and the Mask: A Discussion of Role Theory.” Pp. 41-64 in Role, edited by J.A. Jackson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  7. Broad, K.L. 2002. “Social Movement Selves.” Sociological Perspectives 45 (3):317-336.

  8. Brown, Richard H. 1977. A Poetic for Sociology: Toward a Logic of Discovery for the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  9. Calhoun, Craig. 1991. “Morality, Identity, and Historical Explanation: Charles Taylor on the Sources of the Self.” Sociological Theory 9:232-263.

  10. Callero, Peter L. 1994. “From Role-Playing to Role-Using: Understanding Role as Resource.” Social Psychology Quarterly 57 (3):228-243.

  11. Carr, David. 2003. “Transcendental and Empirical Subjectivity: The Self in the Transcendental Tradition.” Pp. 181-198 in The New Husserl: A Critical Reader, edited by D. Welton. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  12. Castells, Manuel. 1997. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture; Volume II: The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.

  13. Cerulo, Karen A. 1997. “Identity Construction: New Issues, New Directions.” Annual Review of Sociology 23:385-409.

  14. Chai, Sun-Ki. 2001. Choosing an Identity: A General Model of Preference and Belief Formation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  15. Chriss, James J. 1995. “Habermas, Goffman, and Communicative Action: Implications for Professional Practice.” American Sociological Review 60:545- 565.

  16. Chriss, James J. 1996. “The Young Parsons and the Mature Habermas.” American Sociologist 27 (4):38-40, 58, 59.

  17. Chriss, James J. 1999a. “Role Distance and the Negational Self.” Pp. 64-80 in Goffman and Social Organization, edited by G. Smith. London: Routledge.

  18. Chriss, James J. 1999b. “The Family under Siege.” Pp. 187-198 in Counseling and the Therapeutic State, edited by J.J. Chriss. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

  19. Chriss, James J. 2003. “Goffman as Microfunctionalist.” Pp. 181-196 in Goffman’s Legacy, edited by Javier Treviño. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

  20. Chriss, James J. 2007. “The Functions of the Social Bond.” Sociological Quarterly 48 (4):689-712.

  21. Daly, Kerry. 2002. “Time, Gender, and the Negotiation of Family Schedules.” Symbolic Interaction 25 (3):323-342.

  22. Delanty, Gerard. 1997. “Habermas and Occidental Rationalism: The Politics of Identity, Social Learning, and the Cultural Limits of Moral Universalism.” Sociological Theory 15:30-59.

  23. Edgley, Charles. 2003. “The Dramaturgical Genre.” Pp. 141-172 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by L.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.

  24. Elliott, Michael A. 2007. “Human Rights and the Triumph of the Individual in World Culture.” Cultural Sociology 1 (3):343-363.

  25. Ellwood, Charles A. 1938. A History of Social Philosophy. New York: PrenticeHall.

  26. England, Paula and Irene Browne. 1992. “Internalization and Constraint in Theories of Women’s Subordination.” Pp. 97-123 in Current Perspectives in Social Theory, vol. 12, edited by B. Agger. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  27. Ezzy, Douglas. 1998. “Theorizing Narrative Identity: Symbolic Interactionism and Hermeneutics.” Sociological Quarterly 39:239-252.

  28. Feldman, Leonard C. 2002. “Redistribution, Recognition, and the State: The Irreducibly Political Dimension of Injustice.” Political Theory 30 (3):410-440.

  29. Flaherty, Michael. 2002. “Making Time: Agency and the Construction of Temporal Experience.” Symbolic Interaction 25 (3):379-388.

  30. Flaherty, Michael G. 2003. “Time Work: Customizing Temporal Experience.” Social Psychology Quarterly 66 (1):17-33.

  31. Frank, David J. and John W. Meyer. 2002. “The Profusion of Individual Roles and Identities in the Postwar Period.” Sociological Theory 20:86-105.

  32. Fraser, Nancy. 2001. “Recognition without Ethics?” Theory, Culture and Society 18 (2-3):21-42.

  33. Gecas, Viktor and Peter J. Burke. 1995. “Self and Identity.” Pp. 41-67 in Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, edited by K.S. Cook, G.A. Fine, and J.S. House. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

  34. Gergen, Kenneth J. 1991. The Saturated Self: Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life. New York: Basic Books.

  35. Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  36. Giddings, Franklin H. 1899. The Elements of Sociology. New York: Macmillan.

  37. Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.

  38. Goffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.

  39. Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  40. Goffman, Erving. 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.

  41. Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  42. Gonos, George. 1977. “’Situation’ versus ‘Frame’: The ‘Interactionist’ and the ‘Structuralist’ Analyses of Everyday Life.” American Sociological Review 42:854- 867.

  43. Gouldner, Alvin W. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Basic.

  44. Gouldner, Alvin W. 1979. The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class. New York: Seabury Press.

  45. Habermas, Jürgen. 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests, translated by J.J. Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press.

  46. Habermas, Jürgen. 1973. Theory and Practice, translated by J. Viertel. Boston: Beacon Press.

  47. Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 1, translated by T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.

  48. Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2, translated by T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.

  49. Halter, Marilyn. 2000. Shopping for Identity: The Marketing of Ethnicity. New York: Schocken Books.

  50. Harré, Rom. 1991. “The Discursive Production of Selves.” Theory and Psychology 1 (1):51-63.

  51. Henrich, Dieter. 2004. “Subjectivity as Philosophical Principle.” Pp. 233-258 in Critical Theory after Habermas: Encounters and Departures, edited by D. Freundlieb, W. Hudson, and J. Rundell. Leiden: Brill.

  52. Hitlin, Steven. 2003. “Values as the Core of Personal Identity: Drawing Links Between Two Theories of Self.” Social Psychology Quarterly 66 (2):118-137.

  53. Holstein, James A. and Jaber F. Gubrium. 2000. The Self We Live By: Narrative Identity in a Postmodern World. New York: Oxford University Press.

  54. Howard, Judith A. 2000. “Social Psychology of Identities.” Annual Review of Sociology 26:367-393.

  55. Howarth, Caroline. 2002. “Identity in Whose Eyes? The Role of Representations in Identity Construction.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32 (2):145- 162.

  56. James, William. 1890. Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt.

  57. Joas, Hans. 1985. “Role Theories and Socialization Research.” Pp. 37-53 in Micro-Sociological Theory, edited by H.J. Helle and S.N. Eisenstadt. London: Sage.

  58. Kellerhals, Jean, Cristina Ferreira, and David Perrenoud. 2002. “Kinship Cultures and Identity Transmissions.” Current Sociology 50 (2):213-228.

  59. Kim, Kwang-ki. 2003. Order and Agency in Modernity: Talcott Parsons, Erving Goffman, and Harold Garfinkel. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

  60. Kuhn, Manford H. and Thomas S. McPartland. 1954. “An Empirical Investigation of Self-Attitudes.” American Sociological Review 19 (1):68-76.

  61. Levine, Donald N. 1995. Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  62. Lewin, Kurt. 1951. Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. New York: Harper.

  63. Linton, Ralph. 1936. The Study of Man: An Introduction. New York: D. AppletonCentury.

  64. Loseke, Donileen R. 2007. “The Study of Identity as Cultural, Institutional, Organizational, and Personal Narratives: Theoretical and Empirical Integrations.” Sociological Quarterly 48 (4):661-688.

  65. Luckmann, Thomas. 1979. “Personal Identity as an Evolutionary and Historical Problem.” Pp. 56-74 in Human Ethology: Claims and Limits of a New Discipline, edited by M. von Cranach, K. Foppa. W. Lepenies, and D. Ploog. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  66. MacCannell, Dean. 1990. “The Descent of the Ego.” Pp. 19-39 in Beyond Goffman: Studies on Communication, Institution, and Social Interaction, edited by S.H. Riggins. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  67. Maine, Henry Sumner. 1963 [1861]. Ancient Law. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

  68. Markowitz, Fran. 1997. “Culture Change, Border Crossings and Identity Shopping: Jewish Teenagers from the CIS Assess Their Future in Israel.” In Russian Jews on Three Continents: Migration and Resettlement, edited by N. Lewin-Epstein, Y. Ro’i, and P. Ritt

  69. Martin, Daniel D. 2002. “From Appearance Tales to Oppression Tales: Frame Alignment and Organizational Identity.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 31 (2):158-206.

  70. Mason, Jennifer. 2004. “Personal Narratives, Relations Selves: Residential Histories in the Living and Telling.” Sociological Review 52 (2):162-179.

  71. McCall, George J. 2003. “The Me and the Not-Me: Positive and Negative Poles of Identity.” Pp. 11-25 in Advances in Identity Theory and Research, edited by P.J. Burke, T.J. Owens, R.T. Serpe, and P.A. Thoits. New York: Kluwer Academic Press.

  72. McCall, George J. 2006. “Symbolic Interaction.” Pp. 1-23 in Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, edited by P.J. Burke. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  73. McGuire, William J. 1984. “Search for the Self: Going beyond Self-Esteem and the Reactive Self.” Pp. 73-120 in Personality and the Prediction of Behavior, edited by R.A. Zucker, J. Aranoff, and A.I. Rabin. San Diego: Academic Press.

  74. McGuire, William J. and Claire V. McGuire. 1987. “Developmental Trends and Gender Differences in the Subjective Experience of Self.” Pp. 134-146 in Self and Identity: Perspectives across the Lifespan, edited by T. Honess and K. Yardley. London: Routledge

  75. Mead, George H. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, edited by C.W. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  76. Meyers, Peter A. 2006. “Speaking Truth to Ourselves: Lukács, ‘False Consciousness’ and a Dilemma of Identity Politics in Democracy.” International Review of Sociology 16 (3):549-589.

  77. Misztal, Barbara A. 2001. “Normality and Trust in Goffman’s Theory of Interaction Order.” Sociological Theory 19:312-324.

  78. Moldoveanu, Mihnea and Howard Stevenson. 2001. “The Self as a Problem: The Intra-personal Coordination of Conflicting Desires.” Journal of SocioEconomics 30:295-330.

  79. Moreno, Jacob. 1934. Who Shall Survive? Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Co.

  80. Nolan, James L., Jr. 2001. Reinventing Justice: The American Drug Court Movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  81. Orrange, Robert M. 2003. “The Emerging Mutable Self: Gender Dynamics and Creative Adaptations in Defining Work, Family, and the Future.” Social Forces 82 (1):1-34.

  82. Owens, Timothy J. 2003. “Self and Identity.” Pp. 205-232 in Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by J. Delamater. New York: Kluwer.

  83. Park, Robert E. 1926. “Behind Our Masks.” Survey Graphic 56:135-139.

  84. Park, Robert E. 1927. “Human Nature and Collective Behavior.” American Journal of Sociology 32:695-703.

  85. Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe: Free Press.

  86. Parsons, Talcott. 1968. “The Position of Identity in the General Theory of Action.” Pp. 11-23 in The Self in Social Interaction, vol. 1, Classic and Contemporary Perspectives, edited by C. Gordon and K.J. Gergen. New York: Wiley.

  87. Parsons, Talcott. 1977. Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory. New York: Free Press.

  88. Parsons, Talcott. 1996 [1922]. “The Theory of Human Behavior in Its Individual and Social Aspects.” American Sociologist 27 (4):13-23.

  89. Parsons, Talcott and Gerald M. Platt. 1973. The American University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  90. Popitz, Heinrich. 1972. “The Concept of Social Role as an Element of Sociological Theory.” Pp. 11-39 in Role, edited by J.A. Jackson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  91. Randall, William L. 1995. The Stories We Are: An Essay on Self-Creation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  92. Rawls, Anne Warfield. 1987. “The Interaction Order Sui Generis: Goffman’s Contribution to Social Theory.” Sociological Theory 5 (2):136-149.

  93. Reitzes, Donald C. and Elizabeth J. Mutran. 2003. “Self-Concept as the Organization of Roles: Importance, Centrality, and Balance.” Sociological Quarterly 43 (4):647-667.

  94. Reynolds, Larry T. 2003. “Intellectual Precursors.” Pp. 39-58 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by L.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.

  95. Ricouer, Paul. 1992. Oneself as Another, translated by K. Blamey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  96. Seigel, Jerrold. 2005. The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe since the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  97. Solomon, Robert C. 1988. Continental Philosophy since 1750: The Rise and Fall of the Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  98. Stone, Gregory P. 1962. “Appearance and the Self.” Pp. 86-118 in Human Behavior and Social Processes, edited by A.M. Rose. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  99. Strydom, Piet. 2001. “The Problem of Triple Contingency in Habermas.” Sociological Theory 19 (2):165-186.

  100. Stryker, Sheldon. 1980. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.

  101. Stryker, Sheldon. 1987. “The Vitalization of Symbolic Interactionism.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50 (1):83-94.

  102. Stryker, Sheldon, Timothy J. Owens, and Robert W. White. (eds.) 2000. Self, Identity, and Social Movements. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  103. Taylor, Charles. 1994. “The Politics of Recognition.” Pp. 25-73 in Multiculturalism, edited by A. Gutmann. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  104. Turner, Ralph H. 1985. “Unanswered Questions in the Convergence between Structuralist and Interactionist Role Theories.” Pp. 22-36 in Micro-Sociological Theory, edited by H.J. Helle and S.N. Eisenstadt. London: Sage.

  105. Turner, Ralph H. 2001. “Role Theory.” Pp. 233-254 in Handbook of Sociological Theory, edited by J.H. Turner. New York: Kluwer.

  106. Vaughan, Ted R. and Gideon Sjoberg. 1986. “Human Rights Theory and the Classical Sociological Tradition.” Pp. 127-141 in Sociological Theory in Transition, edited by M.L. Wardell and S.P. Turner. London: Allen and Unwin.

  107. Verhoeven, Jef. 1985. “Goffman’s Frame Analysis and Modern MicroSociological Paradigms.” Pp. 71-100 in Micro-Sociological Theory, edited by H.J. Helle and S.N. Eisenstadt. London: Sage.

  108. Weigert, Andrew J. and Viktor Gecas. 2003. “Self.” Pp. 267-288 in Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism, edited by L.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.

  109. Wexler, P. 1998. “Reselfing after Postmodern Culture: Sacred Social Psychology.” Current Perspectives in Social Theory 18:57-83.

  110. Wiley, Norbert. 1994. The Semiotic Self. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  111. Williams, Robin. 2000. Making Identity Matter: Identity, Society and Social Interaction. Durham, UK: Sociologypress.

Downloads

Published

2015-01-01

How to Cite

Chriss, J. (2015) “Goffman, Parsons, and the Negational Self”, Academicus International Scientific Journal. Vlora, Albania, 6(11), pp. 11–31. doi: 10.7336/academicus.2015.11.01.

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 11 (2015): Academicus

Section

Articles

License

License

Creative Commons License

All articles content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons License of
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC