Process of Reconciliation in a Postconflict Macedonia

Authors

  • Biljana Popovska Hochschule Furtwangen University, Germany. Ministry of Defense of the Republic of North Macedonia 0000-0002-2772-8347
  • Zhanet Ristoska Asistent Professor, Military Academy General Mihailo Apostolski, Skopje, North Macedoria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7336/academicus.2015.11.05

Abstract

In this article we will consider reconciliation in a post-conflict Macedonia. When Ohrid Framework Agreement (OFA) was signed, the international community greeted the achievements of the international community as it was signed under specific circumstances. Since it stopped the conflict, it had achieved its goal. Legally, the country became a multiethnic one with a power-sharing government. Yet, the political and intellectual elite, which slightly differ from each other, did not invest intellectual and political capital when searching for a specific Macedonian (inter) national identity, which goes beyond the limitations of the ethnic definitions and mythology around them. Instead, the national discourse is emphasized. Using the terms such as multiculturalism, multhiethnicity and polylingualisam creates additional confusion. When media and politicians use these phrases and incorporate their own political discourses, the damage is done. Critical thinking is not on the agenda in the educational process and the young people are expected to listen rather than think. There is a need for a structural communication among the citizens, a social link but also a philosophical and maybe an ideological communication, so as to fill in the gaps and avoid further divisions. The only way to accomplish that is to have an open and inclusive society. In order to achieve this, the culture of dialog should be nurtured. It is not enough for Macedonians and Albanians to know each other’s folklore and cultural history. Coexistence requires knowing the modern reality. Structured communication is a key. Absence of public discourse has a positive effect on the society’s wellbeing. A debate is not a threat to the process of creating politics. Instead, it legalizes the decision-making process. The intellectual elite should take the lead, show its grandiosity, and view Macedonia as a whole in a joint narrative, which considers all the specifics of the different cultures living together and integrates them in a common goal. In that respect, the OFA was the first necessary step, and its treatment as a Holy Grail ignores the fact that the job is not done. Instead it has just started.

Keywords:

reconciliation, Macedonia, post-conflict period, political elites, identity

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Amnesty International. (2012). Amnesty International Annual Report 2012 – Macedonia.

  2. Amnesty Law (2002). Official Gazette.

  3. ErmiraMehmeti. (2011). Associated Press Writer, In Associated Press (AP).

  4. FisnikShabani, Legal Framework: Comprehensive review of laws for implementation of OFA (36-44) OFA-Case studies( MCIS), August 2011.

  5. http://dnevnik.com. mk/?ItemID=08E89545D130EF429BC924F83CFBCFDD20.01.2012, 18:20.

  6. http://dnevnik.com. mk/?ItemID=422646FA9D61C74F82A5F247B923190304.01.2012, 18:10.

  7. http://dnevnik.com.mk/default. asp?ItemID=01F2921413CF554EAEFC630C5536CF4C29.01.2012, 19:08.

  8. http://dnevnik.com.mk/default. asp?ItemID=0D7F334345F11248ACF2F5A16EA2A07801.03.2012, 18:22.

  9. http://dnevnik.com.mk/default. asp?ItemID=EF1CA2040C71D940B6DA3E2DB4C1499E 19.02.2012, 18:29.

  10. http://sitel.com.mk/dnevnik/makedonija/incidentite-so-megjuetnichkapozadina-prodolzuvaat10.03.2012 - 20:56.

  11. http://utrinski.com.mk/?ItemID=6BE00DA020DD6A4DA02DC67EAE409B2A accessed on 31.10.2012, 12:32.

  12. http://www.balkaninsight.com/mk/article/ - families of the kidnapped Macedonians are looking for a final outcome.

  13. http://www.dnevnik.com. mk/?ItemID=FC71213F9DFA6B49A544CFD37DF64558 04.07.2012, 22:09.

  14. http://www.dnevnik.com.mk/default. asp?ItemID=4EECEE78DA9C8647AAE35D4921172D92 16.08.2012, 14:49.

  15. http://www.dnevnik.com.mk/default. asp?ItemID=ABD89DA66DA02742BFA557D34627702D 21.08.2012, 18:06.

  16. http://www.dnevnik.com.mk/default. asp?ItemID=C60C5D2C35867F44ACBE70F784211E5F 21.08.2012, 17:42.

  17. http://www.sitel.com.mk/dnevnik/makedonija/sovetnicite-na-osmani-sakaatda-imenuvaat-ulici-po-fashistite20.08.2012 - 17:23.

  18. http://www.sitel.com.mk/dnevnik/makedonija/vladata-ne-ispratiladelegacija-nejzini-chlenovi-privatno-bile-vo-slupchane15.08.2012 - 17:27.

  19. http://www.sitel.com.mk/dnevnik/makedonija/vo-struga-popladnevozapaleno-makedonsko-zname23.01.2012 - 18:02.

  20. HumaHaider (2011): Social repair in divided societies: integrating a coexistence lens into transitional justice, Conflict, Security & Development, 11:02, 175-203 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2011.572458.

  21. Ljubomir D. Frchkovski, 2011 In Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.2, No.3, September 2011.

  22. Uppsala Conflict Data Program( retrieval date 2012/12/29) UCDP Conflict Encyclopedia: www.ucdp.uu/se/database,Upsala University Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Conflict database @pcr.uu.se.

  23. Valentina Stojancevska, BIRN Skopje In Culture watch as of January 16,2013 http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/macedonia-s-costly-mediacampaigns-raise-suspicions accessed on Jan 24 2013.

  24. Macedonian Center for International Cooperation(MCIC) – ORD interviews,Skopje, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2015-01-01

How to Cite

Popovska, B. and Ristoska, Z. (2015) “Process of Reconciliation in a Postconflict Macedonia”, Academicus International Scientific Journal. Vlora, Albania, 6(11), pp. 63–76. doi: 10.7336/academicus.2015.11.05.

Issue

Section

Articles