The Technological Expansion of Sociability: Virtual Communities as Imagined Communities

Authors

  • Camelia Grădinaru Department of Interdisciplinary Research, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Iași, Romania 0000-0002-3019-3056

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7336/academicus.2016.14.13

Abstract

The reception of Benedict Anderson’s ideas was very fruitful in many disciplines, and his work provided key concepts that can now throw a clarifying light in some blurry matters. The expression “imagined community” has known a remarkable proliferation, a situation that led to both the formation of a research direction and to the perpetuation of a cliché. In this respect, my article pointed out some suggestive characteristics of virtual communities, explaining why the imagined community is a valuable subject for the theorists of new media. The impossibility to know in person all the members of a big community is just one factor that determines its imagined face. Moreover, the set of values and inner presuppositions that guide the members are important bricks in the construction of community. In my opinion, the virtual community is imagined as a multi-layered experience (technological, conversational, relational etc.). The dynamic of a virtual community contains the tension amongst these layers and the degree of its imagined side depends on multiple factors. In order to illustrate these aspects, I gave a brief example by analysing a Romanian virtual community, using the triad common language – temporality – high centers. In spite of its limitations, the perspectives offered by this concept are still useful for understanding the nature of online communities. Thus, the imagined community is a valuable set of beliefs and practices that underlie and bolster the effective meaning and functioning of the virtual communities.

Keywords:

virtual community, imagined community, online communication, cyberspace, online sociability

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York: Verso.

  2. Bakardjieva, Maria. 2005. Internet Society: The Internet Everyday Life. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

  3. Baym, Nancy. 2000. Tune In, Log on: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

  4. Brabazon, Tara. 2001. “How imagined are virtual communities? Mots pluriels 18, http://www.arts.uwa.edu.au/MotsPluriels/MP1801tb2.html.

  5. Castells, Manuel. 2001. L’Ère de l’information, vol. I, La société en réseaux. Paris: Fayard.

  6. Fernback, Jan. 2007. „Beyond the diluted community concept: a symbolic interactionist perspective on online social relations”, in New Media and Society, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 49-69.

  7. Flichy, Patrice. 2003. L’Innovation technique. Récents développments en sciences sociales. Paris: La Découverte.

  8. Ferrarotti, Franco. “On the way to «Creative Empathy»: the concept of truth as a social community enterprise in GB Vico’s «New Science».” Academicus International Scientific Journal 2 (2010): 10-25.

  9. Foster, Derek. 1996. “Community and Identity in the Electronic Village”. In Internet Culture, edited by David Porter, 23-37. New York: Routledge.

  10. Fox, Steve. 2004. “The New Imagined Community: Identifying and Exploring a Bidirectional Continuum Integrating Virtual and Physical Communities through the Community Embodiment Model (CEM)”. Journal of Communication Inquiry 28 (1): 47-62.

  11. Gibson, William. 1984. Neuromancer. New York: Mass Market Paperback.

  12. Gradinaru, Camelia. 2011. “Virtual Communities – A New Sense of Social Intersection”. Journal of Communication and Public Relations, vol. 13, no. 1 (21): 21-35.

  13. Gruzd, Anatoliy, Wellman, Barry, and Takhteyev, Yuri. 2011. “Imagining Twitter as an Imagined Community”. American Behavioral Scientist 55 (10): 1294-1318.

  14. Haythornthwaite, Caroline and Wellman, Barry. 2002. “The Internet in Everyday Life. An Introduction”. In The Internet in Everyday Life, edited by Barry Wellman and Caroline Haythornthwaite, 3-41. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

  15. Hill Collins, P. 2010. “The New Politics of Community”. American Sociological Review 75 (1): 7-30.

  16. Musaraj, Arta, and Argita Malltezi. “Communication Technologies and the public service: Is it the case of citizens inclusion in the public service standard in Albania?.” Academicus International Scientific Journal 5 (2012): 26-42.

  17. Hillary, George. 1955. “Definitions of Community: Areas of Agreement”. Rural Sociology 20: 111-123.

  18. Ishii, Kenichi. 2006. ”Implications of Mobility: The Uses of Personal Communication Media in Everyday Life”. Journal of Communication 56: 346- 365.

  19. Kollock, Peter. 1999. “The economies of online cooperation: gifts and public goods in cyberspace”. In Communities in Cyberspace, edited by Peter Kollock and Marc Smith, 220-239. London: Routledge.

  20. Vasmatics, Gabor. “The revolution of communication and its effect on our life.” Academicus International Scientific Journal 1 (2010): 100-108.

  21. LaRose, Robert, Kim, Junghyun, and Wei, Peng. 2011. “Social Networking: Addictive, Compulsive, Problematic, or Just Another Media Habit?”. In A Networked Self. Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, edited by Zizi Papacharissi, 59-81. N

  22. Marwick, A. E. and boyd, danah. 2011. “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience”. New media & society 13(1): 114-133.

  23. Matei, Sorin Adam. 2011. “Introduction”. In Virtual Sociability: From Community to Communitas, edited by Sorin Adam Matei and Brian C. Britt, 1-8. Indianapolis: Ideagora.

  24. McLuhan, Marshall. 1994. Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man. New York: MIT Press.

  25. Norton, Bonny. 2001. “Non-participation, imagined communities, and the language classroom”. In Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research, edited by M. Breen, 159-171. Harlow: Pearson Education.

  26. Rheingold, Howard. 2000. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, London.

  27. Phillips, T. 2002. “Imagined communities and self-identity: an exploratory quantitative analysis”. Sociology 36 (3): 597-617.

  28. Wellman, Barry; Haase, Anabel Quan; Witte, James; Hampton, Keith. 2001. ”Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital?”. American Behavioral Scientist 45 (3): 436-455.

Downloads

Published

2016-07-01

How to Cite

Grădinaru, C. (2016) “The Technological Expansion of Sociability: Virtual Communities as Imagined Communities”, Academicus International Scientific Journal. Vlora, Albania, 7(14), pp. 181–190. doi: 10.7336/academicus.2016.14.13.

Issue

Section

Articles