Regional management of the Bay of Bengal water area. The challenges of maritime security




The Bay of Bengal is the largest bay in the world that forms the northeastern part of the Indian Ocean, bordered mostly by the Eastern Coast of India, southern coast of Bangladesh and Sri Lanka to the west and Myanmar and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (part of India) to the east. The regional management of the Bay of Bengal water area is performed by regional organisations such as ASEAN, SAARC, BIMSTEC and IORA unifying Bay’s coastal states. Nevertheless, differences in political and economic interests of the states, separate conflicts between states and consequences of the pandemic not only challenged the integrity of the regional management but also led to rising insecurity of the Bay of Bengal and fears to navigate in that area. In this article, the authors, in a more detailed way, will disclose existing regional management systems, concerns related to maritime security and give recommendations on how to increase efficiency in collective management of maritime security issues and how the concept of due diligence may play the vital role in the regulation of not only maritime security aspects but also aspects of environmental protection and potential transition to the blue economy.


Bay of Bengal, maritime security, regional cooperation, due diligence,


Download data is not yet available.


  1. ASEAN (2021) ’Due Diligence in ASEAN’, ASEAN Briefings. Jakarta: ASEAN. Available at: (Accessed: 20 December 2021).

  2. Attri, V. N. and Bohler-Muller, N. (2018) The Blue Economy Handbook of the Indian Ocean Region. Pretoria: Africa Institute of South Africa Press.

  3. Basu, J. (2020) ‘Bengal most Vulnerable to climate risk, flags India ́s first assessment report’, Down to Earth, Available at: in/news/climate-change/bengal-most-vulnerable-to-climate-risk-flags-india-s- first-assessment-report-72117 (Accessed: 20 December 2021).

  4. Benson, J. (2020) Stable seas: Bay of Bengal. Cape Town: Stable Seas. Available at: (Accessed: 20 December 2021).

  5. Bhaumik, A. (2018) India wants Bay of Bengal to be “common security space”. Bangalore: Deccan Herald. Available at: national/india-wants-bay-bengal-be-688774.html (Accessed: 20 December 2021).

  6. BIMSTEC (2018) Fourth BIMSTEC Summit Declaration. New Delhi: Ministry of External Affairs of India. Available at: documents.htm?dtl%2F30335%2FFourth_BIMSTEC_Summit_Declaration_ August_3031_2018 (Accessed: 20 December 2021).

  7. Bose, S. (2020) ‘BIMSTEC and Disaster Management: Future Prospects for Regional Cooperation’, ORF Issue Brief, 383. New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation.

  8. Bueger, C. and Edmunds, T. (2017) ‘Beyond sea blindness: a new agenda for maritime security studies’, International affairs, 93(6), pp. 1293-1311. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  9. Bueger, C. and Singh Saran, M. (2012) Finding a regional solution to piracy: is the Djibouti Process the answer? Copenhangen: SAFE SEAS. Available at: process-the-answer/ (Accessed: 18 December 2021).

  10. Campbell, E., Dominic, E., Stadnik, S. and Wu,Y. (2018) Due Diligence obligations of international organisation under international law. Available at: https:// (Accessed: 18 December 2021).

  11. Chaudhary, A (2021) Landlockedness, Corruption, and Economic Growth in BIMSTEC. Available at: Landlockedness_Corruption_and_Economic_Growth_in_BIMSTEC (Accessed: 18 December 2021).

  12. Chiodi, G. (2018). Interpreting Global Land and Water Grabbing through Two Rival Economic Paradigms. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 9(18), 42-52.

  13. Chowdhury, S. R., Shahadat, H. M., Subrata, S. and Sharifuzzama, S. M. (2015) Vulnerabilities of the Bay of Bengal to Ocean Acidifiation. Dhaka: IUCN Bangladesh. Available at: (Accessed: 18 December 2021).

  14. Constantino, X. (2018) India attempts to empower BIMSTEC after realising its limitations. Washington: Brookings. Available at: opinions/india-attempts-to-empower-bimstec-after-realising-its-limitations/ (Accessed: 18 December 2021).

  15. Culture Points, AFS (2019) Individualism and Collectivism. New York: AFS. Available at: points/culture-points-individualism-and-collectivism/ (Accessed: 18 December 2021).

  16. Daci, J. (2012). Protection of the Human Right to Water Under International Law-The Need for a New Legal Framework. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 3(06), 71-77.

  17. Daugirdas, K. (2020) Member States’ Due Diligence Obligations to Supervise International Organisations. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Available at: https://papers. (Accessed: 18 December 2021).

  18. Delhi Consensus (2019) 6th Indian Ocean Dialogue. Sydney: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australian Government. Available at: https://www. (Accessed: 18 December 2021).

  19. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Office of Evaluation (2016) Final evaluation of Sustainable Management of the Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem (BOBLME) project. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. Available at: (Accessed: 17 December 2021).

  20. Gamage, R. (2017) ‘Maritime security governance prospects in the bay of Bengal’, East Asia Forum. Jakarta: East Asia Forum. Available at: https://www. the-bay-of-bengal/ (Accessed: 17 December 2021).

  21. Gamage,R.(2017)BayofBengal:WhatimplicationsforASEAN.NewYork:Jstor. Available at: (Accessed: 17 December 2021).

  22. Godbole, S. (2018) Revival of BIMSTEC at the Khathmandu Summit. Washington: Brookings. Available at: front/2018/08/29/revival-of-bimstec-at-the-kathmandu-summit/ (Accessed: 17 December 2021).

  23. International Court of Justice (1949) ‘Corfu Channel case (UK v Albania), Judgment’,ICJReports1949.TheHague:InternationalCourtofJustice.Available at: 00-EN.pdf (Accessed: 18 December 2021).

  24. IORA (2019) Third IORA Ministerial Blue Economy Conference. Quatre Bornes: Indian Ocean Rim Association. Available at: media-news/news-updates-folder/third-iora-ministerial-blue-economy- conference (Accessed: 20 December 2021).

  25. Iyer, G. (2017) ‘Common responses to maritime security threats in the Bay of Bengal’, ORF Issue Brief. New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation. Available at: security-threats-bay-of-bengal/ (Accessed: 17 December 2021).

  26. Karim, T. (2021) ‘The Importance of the Bay of Bengal as a Causeway between the Indian and Pacific Oceans’, Asia Pacific Bulletin, 557. Honolulu: East- West Center. Available at: importance-the-bay-bengal-causeway-between-the-indian-and-pacific- oceans (Accessed: 20 December 2021).

  27. Khurshed, A. M. (n/d) Maritime safety and security in the Bay of Bengal. Dhaka: BSMRMU. Available at: econtents/5eb7aaa6b0958bmj-03-01-02.pdf (Accessed: 17 December 2021).

  28. Koivurova, T. (2006) ‘Due Diligence’, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://www. (Accessed: 17 December 2021).

  29. Levy, J. S. and Thompson, W. R. (2010) ‘Balancing on land and at sea: do states ally against the leading global power?’, International Security, 35(1), pp. 7–43. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  30. Macchi, C. and Bright, C. (2020) ‘Hardening Soft Law: The Implementation of Human Rights Due Diligence Requirements in Domestic Legislation’, Legal Sources in Business and Human Rights - Evolving Dynamics in International and European Law. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  31. Mohammad, H. K. and Ahmad, A. (2015) ‘The Bay of Bengal: Next theatre for strategic power play in Asia’, Croatian International Relations Review, 22, pp. 199-239. Available at: The_Bay_of_Bengal_Next_Theatre_for_Strategic_Power_Play_in_Asia (Accessed: 17 December 2021).

  32. Rahman, M. R. (2017) ‘Blue Economy and Marine Cooperation in the Bay of Bengal: Role of Bangladesh’, Procedia Engineering, 194, pp. 356-361. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.

  33. Rahman, M. R. (2017) ‘Blue Economy and Maritime Cooperation in the Bay of Bengal: Role of Bangladesh’, Procedia Engineering, 194, pp. 356 – 361. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Available at: article/pii/S1877705817333088 (Accessed: 20 December 2021).

  34. Reinisch, A. (2005) The changing international legal framework for dealing with non-state actors, in non-state actors and human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: state_actors_alston_ar.pdf (Accessed: 17 December 2021).

  35. Sakhuja, V. (2014) Blue Economy: An Agenda for the Indian Government. New York: Center for International Maritime Security. Available at: http:// (Accessed: 20 December 2021).

  36. Singh, A. (2020) ‘Towards an Integrated ‘Blue Economy’ Framework in the Bay of Bengal’, ORF Issue Brief, 411. New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation. Available at: economy-framework-in-the-bay-of-bengal/ (Accessed: 20 December 2021).

  37. United Nations (2011) ‘Draft articles on the responsibility of international organisations, with commentaries’, Yearbook of International Law Commission, 2(2). Available at: commentaries/9_11_2011.pdf (Accessed: 17 December 2021).

  38. World Bank (2017) The potential of the Blue Economy. New York: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. Available at: https:// pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (Accessed: 20 December 2021).




How to Cite

Yeasmin, N. and Tkach, P. (2022) “Regional management of the Bay of Bengal water area. The challenges of maritime security”, Academicus International Scientific Journal. Vlora, Albania, 13(25), pp. 104–121. doi: 10.7336/academicus.2022.25.07.