Epistemic Justice in Nature Reserves Management

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7336/academicus.2024.30.06

Abstract

Natural resource management through nature reserves and protected areas has sparked great interest among a variety of stakeholders. Global institutions, as well as national governments and policies, acknowledge the importance of institutionalizing natural resource management to achieve sustainable development goals. However, the literature frequently ignores the consequences of epistemic inequalities caused by stakeholders’ varying indigeneity and politics of belonging. These injustices emerge when stakeholders do not have equal control over resource management and exploitation.

This research focuses on two distinct stakeholder groups with opposing views on environment conservation: indigenous peoples and the legally recognized management of Dwesa Nature Reserve in South Africa (referred to as DNR from here onwards). The main aim of this study was to understand how these two sets of stakeholders perceive one another with regards to epistemic disparities, indigeneity, and politics of belonging. This enabled the exploration of the extent to which these perceptions have an impact on DNR management. Data were obtained from 96 community members from four villages located along DNR using focus group discussions. Additionally, one representative from DNR management participated in a key-informant interview offer an ‘official’ perspective.

The study revealed significant differences in indigeneity, politics of belonging, and epistemic standings among stakeholders. However, these differences do not inherently lead to epistemic injustice in the management of the DNR, as each group views the other as epistemic outsiders, thus balancing potential unfair treatment. Despite their distinct epistemic and cultural backgrounds, all stakeholders engage in nature conservation through different terminologies and frameworks. The study highlights the intersection of Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) and Euro-American Knowledge Systems, demonstrating their interdependence and effective communication within their respective contexts. Both knowledge systems help to achieve the common objective of protecting the DNR.

The study also reveals overlaps between stakeholders’ indigeneity and epistemic knowledge, demonstrating that, while their techniques differ, their shared goal is sustainable conservation. The research advocates for more inclusive conservation frameworks that acknowledge and embrace the diverse epistemic contributions of all stakeholders. Addressing social and epistemic disparities can make conservation initiatives in DNR sustainable. 

Keywords:

Environmental Conservation, Epistemic Justice, Indigeneity, Politics of Belonging, Cwebe Nature Reserve, South Africa

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Akpan, W. (2011). ‘Local’ knowledge, ‘global’ knowledge, ‘development’ knowledge: Finding a new balance in the knowledge power play. South African Review of Sociology, 42(3), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2011.621244

  2. Antonsich, M. (2010). Searching for belonging–an analytical framework. Geography compass, 4(6), 644-659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00317.x

  3. Armstrong, C. (2017). Justice and Natural Resources: An Egalitarian Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  4. Baker, S., & Constant, N. L. (2020). Epistemic justice and the integration of local ecological knowledge for marine conservation: Lessons from the Seychelles. Marine Policy, 117, 103921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103921

  5. Ballard, K. (2018). Inclusion, paradigms, power and participation. In Towards inclusive schools? (pp. 1-14). Routledge https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429469084-1/inclusion-paradigms-power-participation-keith-ballard

  6. Börner, J., Schulz, D., Wunder, S., & Pfaff, A. (2020). The effectiveness of forest conservation policies and programs. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12, 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-110119-025703

  7. Fay, D. (2008). Property, subjection and protected areas: The ‘restitution’ of Dwesa-Cwebe nature Reserve, South Africa. In The Rights and Wrongs of Land Restitution (pp. 45-62). Routledge-Cavendish.

  8. Fishel, S., Winter, C. J., & Burke, A. (2021). Between Ecology and Indigeneity. Borderlands Journal, 20(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21307/borderlands-2021-001

  9. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. OUP Oxford.

  10. Hoza, D. M. (2012). The Kid Loses to Domination: Environmentality, modern domination and subjecthood in Ken Kesey’s “Sometimes a Great Notion”. The University of Utah. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1033500206?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses

  11. Iovan, M. (2014). Eco-Education: A Required Element of Public Policies for Sustainable Social and Economic Development. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 9, 14-28. https://doi.org/10.7336/academicus.2014.09.01

  12. Kimmerer, R. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Milkweed editions.

  13. Klass, A. B. (2020). Eminent Domain Law as Climate Policy. Wis. L. REv., 49.

  14. Koontz, T. M., Jager, N. W., & Newig, J. (2020). Assessing collaborative conservation: A case survey of output, outcome, and impact measures used in the empirical literature. Society & Natural Resources, 33(4), 442-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1583397

  15. López-Rivera, A. (2020). Blurring global epistemic boundaries: The emergence of traditional knowledge in environmental governance (No. 25). Global Cooperation Research Papers. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/221737

  16. Mathews, F. (2022). Conservation needs to include a ‘story about feeling’. Biological Conservation, 272, 109668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109668

  17. McCarthy, C., Shinjo, H., Hoshino, B., & Enkhjargal, E. (2018). Assessing Local Indigenous Knowledge and Information Sources on Biodiversity, Conservation and Protected Area Management at Khuvsgol Lake National Park, Mongolia. Land, 7(4), 117 https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040117

  18. Medina, J. (2013). The epistemology of resistance: Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and the social imagination. Oxford University Press.

  19. Miftari, A. (2020). Sustainable Agriculture and Farmers Choices Among Short Term Efficiency and Preserving the Future. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 21, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.7336/academicus.2020.21.08

  20. Nyamahono, J. D. (2023). Participation dynamics in the management of protected areas: the case of Dwesa-Cwebe Nature Reserve and its adjacent communities, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, University of Fort Hare). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/588487734.pdf

  21. Petersmann, M. C. (2021). Contested indigeneity and traditionality in environmental litigation: the politics of expertise in regional human rights courts. Human Rights Law Review, 21(1), 132-156. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaa054

  22. Prasad, J. (2024). The Primacy of Politics: Interrogating Indigeneity and Ecology in India. https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/28822/SAC-2023-11-ReviewEssay-Prasad.pdf?sequence=1

  23. Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Bloomsbury Publishing.

  24. Sowman, M & Sunde, J. (2018). Social impacts of marine protected areas in South Africa on coastal fishing communities. Ocean and Coastal Management, 157, 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.02.013

  25. Al-Mansoori, F., & Hamdan, A. (2023). Integrating Indigenous Knowledge Systems into Environmental Education for Biodiversity Conservation: A Study of Sociocultural Perspectives and Ecological Outcomes. AI, IoT and the Fourth Industrial Revolution Review, 13(7), 61-74. https://scicadence.com/index.php/AI-IoT-REVIEW/article/view/10

  26. Sunde, J. (2014). Customary Governance and Expressions of Living Customary Law at Dwesa-Cwebe: Contributions towards Small-scale Fisheries Governance in South Africa. Doctoral thesis. University of Cape Town. https://open.uct.ac.za/items/a8d696eb-1e1f-46b7-a39e-67b2b73834b6

  27. Tsawu, S. (2022). Traditional authorities and co-management of protected areas in South Africa: the case of Dwesa-Cwebe Nature Reserve in the Eastern Cape. https://open.uct.ac.za/items/79d21964-3302-4caf-a551-a6f2ba90f0c3

  28. Yuval-Davis, N. (2016). Power, Intersectionality and the Politics of Belonging. In: Harcourt, W. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-38273-3_25

Downloads

Published

2024-07-11

How to Cite

Nyamahono, J. (2024) “Epistemic Justice in Nature Reserves Management”, Academicus International Scientific Journal. Vlora, Albania, 15(30), pp. 78–97. doi: 10.7336/academicus.2024.30.06.

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 30 (2024): Academicus

Section

Articles

License

License

Creative Commons License

All articles content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons License of
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC