Vlerësime dhe kritika ndaj veprave të Ronald Dworkin si filozof i së drejtës





The purpose of this paper is to give a general overview of Dworkin's works regarding naturalism and positivism. Dworkin is considered one of the most prominent figures in legal studies. He was a leading figure in contemporary legal philosophy . Interpretivism is famously associated with Ronald Dworkin , considered one of the most prominent liberal egalitarian political philosophers, who has consistently tried to create the best possible theory of distributive justice of equality so that all members of society can live well. Ronald Dworkin has made a great contribution regarding the legal interpretation that judges should make when considering a judicial process. The latter are occasionally faced with unclear legal provisions or for a given issue there may be legal gaps. Dworkin aims at the reaffirmation, the redemption of utopian moral foundations, with a character and mobilizing force of liberalism. In a summary of Dworkin's conception of justice, he defines it as a sovereign virtue of a liberal political community, and at the same time the justice of time is a parameter of individual ethics. For the construction of the paper, qualitative, descriptive methods were used based on in a wide literature of different foreign authors. In the paper, first, a short analysis will be made of Dworkin's works, 'models of rules' and 'naturalism'. We will continue with criticisms and evaluations which have different authors in relation to the works of Dworkin. Then we will make a synthesis of the paper, listing the recommendations and conclusions reached.

Fjalët kyçe:

philosophy of law, interpretivism, naturalism, positivism


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Majlinda Velçani, Faculty of Political Sciences and Law, Aleksandër Moisiu University, Durrës

Faculty of Political Sciences and Law, Aleksandër Moisiu University, Durrës, Email: linda88_dr@hotmail.com,  orcid: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3054-0208


  1. Barbara Baum Levenbook, ‘’The Sustained Dworkin’’, The University of Chicago Law Review, 53:1108,1986

  2. Dragica Vujadinovic, PhD,’’Ronald Dworkin : The theory of justice’’, European Scientific Journal February /Special/ edition vol. 8, No.2 ISSN: 1857 – 7881

  3. Elise G. Nalbandian,’’ Notes on Ronald Dworkin’s theory of law’’, Mizan Law Review ,Vol. 3 No.2, September 2009

  4. Freeman Samuel, ‘’Markets&Dworkin’s equality of resources’’ ,Boston University Law Review, Vol. 90:921,2010

  5. Guest Stephen, ‘’Dworkin’s ‘one-right-answer’ thesis’’,Problema: Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho, núm. 10, enero-diciembre, 2016,pp. 3-21 Hershovitz Scott, ‘Exploring Law's Empire.The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin’’,Oxford,2008

  6. Herzog, Donald J, "How to Think about Equality." Review of Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, by R. Dworkin’’,Mich. L. Rev. 100, no. 6 (2002): 1621-38.

  7. Imer B. Flores, ‘The Legacy of Ronald Dworkin (1931-2013): A Legal Theory and Methodology for Hedgehogs, Hercules, and One Right Answers’’,

  8. Jeremy Waldron, ’’The Rise and Decline of Integrity’’ , Short version for Conference on Dworkins Later Work August 2019

  9. João Costa-Neto,Rights astrumps and balancing:reconciling the rreconcilable’’, Revista Direito GV,Sao Paulo11(1) | P. 159-188 | Jan-Jun 2015

  10. Julie Allard , ‘Ronald Dworkin: Law as Novel Writing’’, 5 February 2015

  11. Kolodny Niko, ‘Rule Over None I:What Justifies Democracy?’’, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Philosophy & Public Affairs 42, no. 3,2014

  12. Kryeziu, Veli. Roli i mediave në mësimëdhënien e historisë, Prishtinë: Lena Graphic Design, 2021

  13. Marie-Andrée Plante & Anaïs Voy-Gillis, ’’ Ronald Dworkin’s criticism of pragmatism’’, Political Dialogues, 16/2014

  14. Mayavee Singh, ‘Distributive Justice and Hypothetical Device’’, Sambhāṣaṇ Volume 2 : Issue 3

  15. Michel Rosenfeld , Dworkin and the One Law Principle: A Pluralist Critique’’, Dans Revue internationale de philosophie 2005/3 (n° 233), pages 363 à 392,ÉditionsDe Boeck Supérieur

  16. Norman E. Bowie, ‘Taking rights seriously,By Ronald Dworkin. Massachusetts: Harvard University’’ , Press. 1977. Pp. 563., 26 Cath. U. L. Rev. 908 (1977).

  17. Rawls John , ‘A theory of justice’,the belknap press of Harvard University Press.Cambridge, Massachusetts,1971. ISBN 0-674-00077-3

  18. Richard A. Posner, Response, "Conceptions of Legal Theory: A Response to Ronald Dworkin", 29 Arizona State Law Journal 377 (1997)

  19. Ronald A. Dworkin, "Natura Law Revisited’’ , 34 Fla. L. Rev. 165 (1982).https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr

  20. Ronald A. Dworkin, ‘What is Equality? Equality of Resources’’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 10, No. 4 (Autumn, 1981), Blackwell Publishing

  21. Ronald A. Dworkin, ‘What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare’’,,Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 10, No. 3. (Summer, 1981)

  22. Ronald A.Dworkin, "The Model of Rules" (1967). Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 3609

  23. ScottJ. Shapiro, ‘’The “Hart-Dworkin” Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed’’,Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper,Paper Series ,Working Paper NO.77,March 2007

  24. Stavropoulos Nicos, ‘’ The debate that never was’’, HARVARD LAW REVIEW, Vol. 130:2082,2017

  25. Stavropoulos, Nicos, "Legal Interpretivism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition)



Si të citoni

Velçani, Majlinda. 2024. “Vlerësime Dhe Kritika Ndaj Veprave Të Ronald Dworkin Si Filozof I Së drejtës”. Diskutime 13 (31-32):25-37. https://doi.org/10.58923/diskutime.v12i31-32.3870.