Modifikimi i rritjes së nofullave me aparate ortodontike
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55312/op.vi1.4540Abstract
Një përmbledhje e njohurive të sotme për modifikimin e rritjes së nofullave tregon se: 1. Zgjerimi transversal i maksilës është i lehtë përpara adoleshencës, kërkon forca të mëdha gjatë adoleshencës dhe mund të realizohet vetëm me osteotomi kirurgjikale pas adoleshencës. 2. Përshpejtimi i rritjes mandibulare mund të realizohet përpara ose gjatë adoleshencës, por i ndjekur nga një ngadalësim pas trajtimit, që anulon rritjen në përmasa të mandibulës. Kufizimi i rritjes maksilare realizohet me çdo aparat që korrigjon klasat II skeletike. 3. Përpjekjet për kufizimin e rritjes mandibulare në klasat III me forca ekstraorale, rezultojnë kryesisht në një rotacion postero-inferior të mandibulës. Lëvizja përpara e maksilës me forca ekstraorale është e mundur përpara adoleshencës; lëvizja e saj përpara, dhe njëkohësisht kufizimi rritjes përpara i mandibulës, është i mundur në adoleshencë më anë të llastikëve intraoralë të ankoruar direkt në kockë. 4. Për pacientët me fytyrë të shkurtër është i mundur trajtimi për rritjen e lartësisë faciale përpara dhe gjatë adoleshencës. Në pacientët me fytyrë të gjatë, kufizimi i rritjes vertikale gjatë adoleshencës rrallëherë është i suksesshëmKeywords:
çelës: maksilë, rotacion postero-inferior, pacient.Downloads
References
-
Akkaya, S; Lorenzon S, Ucem TT. Comparison of dental arch and arch perimeter changes between bonded rapid and slow expansion procedures. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20:255-61.
-
McNamara, JA Jr; Baccetti T, Franchi L, Erberger TA. Rapid maxillary expansion followed by fixed appliances: a long-term evaluation of changes in arch dimensions. Angle Orthod 2003;73:344-53.
-
Vaid, N; Doshi VM, Vandekar MJ. Class II treatment with functional appliances: a meta-analysis of short-term treatment effects. Semin Orthod 2014; 20:324-38.
-
Tulloch, JFC; Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 111:391-400.
-
Thiruvenkatachari, B; Harrison JE, Worthington HV, O’Brien KD. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (11):CD003452.
-
Franchi, L; Baccetti T. Prediction of individual mandibular changes induced by functional jaw orthopedics followed by fixed appliances in Class II patients. Angle Orthod 2006; 76:950-4.
-
Freeman, CS; McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Graff TW. Treatment effects of the bionator and high-pull headgear combination followed by fixed appliances in patients with increased vertical dimensions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131:184-95.
-
Scheffler NR, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Outcomes and stability in patients with anterior open bite and long anterior face height treated with temporary anchorage devices and a maxillary intrusion splint. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 146:594-602.
-
Delaire J. Maxillary development revisited: relevance to the orthopaedic treatment of Class III malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 1997; 19: 289-311.
-
Wells, AW; Sarver DM, Proffit WR. Longterm efficacy of reversepull headgear therapy. Angle Orthod 2006; 76:915-22.
-
Vaughn, GA; Mason B, Moon HB, Turley PK. The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128:299-309.
-
Sar, Ç; Arman-Ozc irpici C, Uckan S, Yazici AC. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:636-49.
-
Cornelis, MA; Scheffler NR, Mahy P, Siciliano S, De Clerck HJ, Tulloch JF. Modified miniplates for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: placement and removal surgeries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66:1439-45.
-
De Clerck, EE; Swennen GR. Success rate mof miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction. Angle Orthod 2011;
-
:1010-3.
-
Liu, SS; Kyung HM, Buschang PH. Continuous forces are more effective than intermittent forces in expanding sutures. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32:371-80.
-
Nguyen, T; Cevidanes L, Cornelis MA, Heymann G, de Paula LK, De Clerck H. Three-dimensional assessment of maxillarychanges associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140:790-8.
-
De Clerck, H; Nguyen T, de Paula LK, Cevidanes L. Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored Class III intermaxillary traction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142:25-31.
-
Kambara, T. Dentofacial changes produced by extraoral forward force in the Macaca irus. Am J Orthod 1977; 71:249-57.
-
Teuscher, U. An appraisal of growth andreaction to extraoral anchorage: simulation of orthodontic-orthopedic results. Am J Orthod 1986; 89:113-21.
-
Hino, CT; Cevidanes LH, Nguyen TT, De Clerck HJ, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144:705-14.
-
Ruf, S; Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20: 375-88.
-
LeCornu, M; Cevidanes LH, Zhu H, Wu CD, Larson B, Nguyen T. Threedimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144:818-30.
-
Björk, A; Skieller V. Growth of the maxilla in three dimensions as revealed radiographically by the implant method. Br J Orthod 1977; 4:53-64.
References
Akkaya, S; Lorenzon S, Ucem TT. Comparison of dental arch and arch perimeter changes between bonded rapid and slow expansion procedures. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20:255-61.
McNamara, JA Jr; Baccetti T, Franchi L, Erberger TA. Rapid maxillary expansion followed by fixed appliances: a long-term evaluation of changes in arch dimensions. Angle Orthod 2003;73:344-53.
Vaid, N; Doshi VM, Vandekar MJ. Class II treatment with functional appliances: a meta-analysis of short-term treatment effects. Semin Orthod 2014; 20:324-38.
Tulloch, JFC; Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 111:391-400.
Thiruvenkatachari, B; Harrison JE, Worthington HV, O’Brien KD. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (11):CD003452.
Franchi, L; Baccetti T. Prediction of individual mandibular changes induced by functional jaw orthopedics followed by fixed appliances in Class II patients. Angle Orthod 2006; 76:950-4.
Freeman, CS; McNamara JA Jr, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Graff TW. Treatment effects of the bionator and high-pull headgear combination followed by fixed appliances in patients with increased vertical dimensions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131:184-95.
Scheffler NR, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Outcomes and stability in patients with anterior open bite and long anterior face height treated with temporary anchorage devices and a maxillary intrusion splint. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 146:594-602.
Delaire J. Maxillary development revisited: relevance to the orthopaedic treatment of Class III malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 1997; 19: 289-311.
Wells, AW; Sarver DM, Proffit WR. Longterm efficacy of reversepull headgear therapy. Angle Orthod 2006; 76:915-22.
Vaughn, GA; Mason B, Moon HB, Turley PK. The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128:299-309.
Sar, Ç; Arman-Ozc irpici C, Uckan S, Yazici AC. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:636-49.
Cornelis, MA; Scheffler NR, Mahy P, Siciliano S, De Clerck HJ, Tulloch JF. Modified miniplates for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: placement and removal surgeries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66:1439-45.
De Clerck, EE; Swennen GR. Success rate mof miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction. Angle Orthod 2011;
:1010-3.
Liu, SS; Kyung HM, Buschang PH. Continuous forces are more effective than intermittent forces in expanding sutures. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32:371-80.
Nguyen, T; Cevidanes L, Cornelis MA, Heymann G, de Paula LK, De Clerck H. Three-dimensional assessment of maxillarychanges associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140:790-8.
De Clerck, H; Nguyen T, de Paula LK, Cevidanes L. Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored Class III intermaxillary traction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142:25-31.
Kambara, T. Dentofacial changes produced by extraoral forward force in the Macaca irus. Am J Orthod 1977; 71:249-57.
Teuscher, U. An appraisal of growth andreaction to extraoral anchorage: simulation of orthodontic-orthopedic results. Am J Orthod 1986; 89:113-21.
Hino, CT; Cevidanes LH, Nguyen TT, De Clerck HJ, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144:705-14.
Ruf, S; Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20: 375-88.
LeCornu, M; Cevidanes LH, Zhu H, Wu CD, Larson B, Nguyen T. Threedimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144:818-30.
Björk, A; Skieller V. Growth of the maxilla in three dimensions as revealed radiographically by the implant method. Br J Orthod 1977; 4:53-64.
Shqip
English
Italiano
