The role of digitalization in preventing criminal offenses committed by state employees
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55312/op.v17i1.7263Abstract
Digitalization represents one of the most effective tools for strengthening institutional integrity and com-bating corruption in public administration. This paper aims to examine the role of technology in pre-venting criminal offenses committed by state employees and individuals entrusted with a public service, with a focus on the Albanian context. Through the digitalization of procedures, increased traceability of administrative actions, and the automation of services, powerful mechanisms are created to reduce the space for abuse and corruption. The study analyzes the impact of platforms such as e-Albania, electronic procurement systems, and digital registers on increasing transparency and accountability. It also address-es challenges related to the lack of technical capacities, institutional culture, and the need to harmonize the legal framework with technological developments. In conclusion, it is emphasized that digitalization is not merely a technological tool, but a necessity for building trustworthy and fair institutions that can resist corruptive influences and protect the public interest.Keywords:
digitalization, public administration, criminal offenses, transparency, technology in public service.Downloads
References
-
1. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2020). The Role of Technology in Combat-ing Corruption. Link
-
2. OECD. (2017). Digital Government Review of Latvia: Towards a User-Centric Digital State. Link
-
3. European Commission. (2021). Digitalization in Public Administration: Challenges and Opportu-nities. Link
-
4. Transparency International. (2020). Corruption Perceptions Index 2020. Link
-
5. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2019). E-Government and Its Role in Combating Corruption. Link
-
6. World Bank. (2021). Digital Government for Development: A Review of Best Practices. Link
-
7. Bertelsmann Stiftung. (2020). Digital Transformation in the Public Sector: Exploring Opportuni-ties and Risks. Link
-
8. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. (2021). Digitalization in Public Administration: Global Trends and Local Practices. Link
-
9. Grindle, M. S. (2017). Good Governance and the World Bank: The Politics of Public Sector Re-form. Link
-
10. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). (2020). Fundamental Rights and Digital Technologies: New Challenges for Data Privacy and Security. Link
-
11. Council of Europe. (2020). Digital Governance for the Prevention of Corruption: A Review of Eu-ropean Experiences. Link
References
1. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2020). The Role of Technology in Combat-ing Corruption. Link
2. OECD. (2017). Digital Government Review of Latvia: Towards a User-Centric Digital State. Link
3. European Commission. (2021). Digitalization in Public Administration: Challenges and Opportu-nities. Link
4. Transparency International. (2020). Corruption Perceptions Index 2020. Link
5. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2019). E-Government and Its Role in Combating Corruption. Link
6. World Bank. (2021). Digital Government for Development: A Review of Best Practices. Link
7. Bertelsmann Stiftung. (2020). Digital Transformation in the Public Sector: Exploring Opportuni-ties and Risks. Link
8. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. (2021). Digitalization in Public Administration: Global Trends and Local Practices. Link
9. Grindle, M. S. (2017). Good Governance and the World Bank: The Politics of Public Sector Re-form. Link
10. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). (2020). Fundamental Rights and Digital Technologies: New Challenges for Data Privacy and Security. Link
11. Council of Europe. (2020). Digital Governance for the Prevention of Corruption: A Review of Eu-ropean Experiences. Link



