Influencer or victim? Legal aspects of using a child’s image on social media by family members for profit

Autorët

  • Iris Shehaj SCiDEV Center

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55312/op.v17i1.7268

Abstract

In a world where every click can be turned into profit, children are becoming the protagonists of a digital transformation that is fundamentally changing the definition of work and the relationship between childhood and technology. This has created a new landscape where the lack of legal protection regarding children’s rights in relation to income and labor conditions exposes them to exploitation. The creation and distribution of content by parents featuring their children on platforms such as YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok raises concerns about whether children are being exploited for profit without their consent or understanding. In addition to being involved in content to generate income, children are also exposed to the creation of a permanent digital footprint, which can negatively impact their privacy and rights. This article aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the legal gaps in the field of children`s rights and labor, including specific cases from practice, and highlighting the risks that are not covered by existing legal frameworks. In particular, the article examines how international legislation addresses the issue of child exploitation by their family members for financial gain. The article concludes with recommendations emphasizing the need for regulation to protect children’s rights. Due to the nature of this phenomenon, research in this field is still limited, and this article seeks to fill these research gaps.

Keywords:

sharenting, kidfluencer, child labour, social media, privacy, exploitation, Albania.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. 1. Artificial Intelligence Act.

  2. 2. Constitution of the Republic of Albania.

  3. 3. Convention No. 138 of the International Labour Organization (ILO).

  4. 4. Convention on the Rights of the Child.

  5. 5. Coughlan, B. S. (2018). “Sharenting” puts young at risk of online fraud. <https://www.bbc.com/ news/education-44153754> Accessed 23.04.2025.

  6. 6. Criminal Code of the Republic of Albania.

  7. 7. Digital Services Act (DSA).

  8. 8. European Convention on Human Rights.

  9. 9. Family Code of the Republic of Albania.

  10. 10. Fequiere, R. (2025). Piper Rockelle and the Squad Kidfluencer documentary: release date, trailer, what to know. Netflix Tudum. <https://www.netflix.com/tudum/articles/bad-influence-the-dark-side-of-kidfluencing-release-date-news> Accessed 26.04.2025.

  11. 11. Ferrara, P., Cammisa, I., Zona, M., Cimaroli, E., Sacco, R., Pacucci, I., Grimaldi, M. T., Scaltrito, F., Pettoello-Mantovani, M., & Corsello, G. (2024). The awareness of sharenting in Italy: a pilot study. The Italian Journal of Pediatrics/Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 50 (1) <https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13052-024-01797-5>.

  12. 12. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

  13. 13. Guide for Parents and Guardians on Protecting Children Online, NCSA, 2020.

  14. 14. Guide on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, <https://ks.echr.coe.int/docu-ments/d/echr-ks/guide_art_8_eng> Accessed 26.04.2025.

  15. 15. Guidelines for Publishing Children’s Photos Online for Parents and Educators, IDP, 2024.

  16. 16. ILO Convention No. 182.

  17. 17. Kayali, L. (2023). France aims to protect kids from parents oversharing pics online. POLITICO,

  18. <https://www.politico.eu/article/emmanuel-macron-france-law-aims-to-protect-kids-against-over-sharing-parents/> Accessed 26.04.2025.

  19. 18. Keskin, A. D., Kaytez, N., Damar, M., Elibol, F., & Aral, N. (2023). Sharenting syndrome: an ap-propriate use of social media? Healthcare, 11(10), 1359.

  20. <https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11101359>

  21. 19. Kindelan, K. (2025). Utah joins California, Illinois in establishing safeguards for child influenc-ers. ABC News. <https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Family/parenting-influencers-speak-new-law-de-signed-protect-kids/story?id=111580202> Accessed 26.04.2025.

  22. 20. Labor Code of the Republic of Albania.

  23. 21. Law No. 124/2024 “On the Protection of Personal Data”.

  24. 22. Law No. 18/2017 “On the rights and protection of children”.

  25. 23. Mandro, A. (2009). Family Law. Tirana: EMAL.

  26. 24. Masterson, M. (2020). When Play becomes work: Child labor laws in the era of “Kidfluencers.”

  27. <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3650376>.

  28. 25. State Police Regulation, 2025.

  29. 26. UN General Comment No. 25.

  30. 27. Van Der Hof, S., Lievens, E., Milkaite, I., Verdoodt, V., Hannema, T., & Liefaard, T. (2020). The Child’s Right to Protection against Economic Exploitation in the Digital World. The International Journal of Children S Rights, 28(4), 833–859. <https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-28040003>.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-01

How to Cite

Shehaj, I. (2025). Influencer or victim? Legal aspects of using a child’s image on social media by family members for profit. Optime, 17(1), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.55312/op.v17i1.7268

Numër

Section

Social Sciences