Challenges of implementing Law No. 18, dated 23.02.2017, “On the rights and protection of the child”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55312/op.v17i1.7274Abstract
This paper aims to present several theoretical and practical aspects related to the implementation of the Law “On the Rights and Protection of the Child.1” In adopting this law, the legislator sought to take measures to ensure that every child exercises their rights in accordance with their personal development and based on their best interests. Furthermore, in order to adopt concrete measures for the promotion, respect, and protection of children’s rights, the legislator has emphasized the need for cooperation among central and local structures, authorities, and organizations that safeguard children’s rights. The Law “On the Rights and Protection of the Child,” as an important legal act in the field of children’s rights, reflects a series of principles already enshrined in international instruments that guarantee and protect the rights of the child. To ensure the child’s healthy physical, mental, moral, spiritual, and social development, as well as to secure an adequate family and social life, the law establishes the fundamental principle of the best interests of the child2, which must be the primary consideration in all decisions concerning the child3. Respect for the best interests of the child is a binding obligation for parents in the context of building stable family relationships, but it also constitutes a duty for key actors within the integrated child protection system. Therefore, the law also enshrines several other important principles, including: – The principle of equality and non-discrimination;– The principle that every child should live and grow up in an appropriate family environment, and that separation from the family should be considered only as a last resort;– The principle of participation, listening to, and respecting the views of the child, in accordance with the child’s age and capacity for understanding;– The principle of the primary responsibility of parents to provide their child with adequate living conditions, and to ensure their proper upbringing, development, well-being, education, and learning4.Keywords:
Child, Parents, Law No. 18/2017, ECtHR, Standards, Child Protection MeasureDownloads
References
-
1. Bianku, Ledi. Jurisprudence of the Strasbourg Court, Edlora Publishing House, Tirana, 2007.
-
2. Black DBE, Jill et al. A Practical Approach to Family Law, Ninth Edition, Oxford University Press, 2012.
-
3. Bonilini, Giovanni. Manual of Family Law, Luarasi Publishing House, Tirana, 2005.
-
4. Caggia, Fausto. Family and Fundamental Rights in the System of the European Union, Arache
-
Editrice, s.r.l, Rome, 2005.
-
5. Judgment R.M.S. v. Spain, 18 June 2013.
-
6. Judgment Kocherov and Sergeyeva v. Russia, 29 March 2016.
-
7. Judgment Kacper Nowakowski v. Poland, 10 January 2017.
-
8. Case Bondavalli v. Italy, Application No. 35532/12, Judgment of 17 November 2015, ECtHR.
-
9. Judgment Lyubenova v. Bulgaria, 18 October 2011.
-
10. Law No. 18, dated 23.02.2017, “On the Rights and Protection of the Child,” published in the Official Gazette No. 43, dated 9 March 2017.
References
1. Bianku, Ledi. Jurisprudence of the Strasbourg Court, Edlora Publishing House, Tirana, 2007.
2. Black DBE, Jill et al. A Practical Approach to Family Law, Ninth Edition, Oxford University Press, 2012.
3. Bonilini, Giovanni. Manual of Family Law, Luarasi Publishing House, Tirana, 2005.
4. Caggia, Fausto. Family and Fundamental Rights in the System of the European Union, Arache
Editrice, s.r.l, Rome, 2005.
5. Judgment R.M.S. v. Spain, 18 June 2013.
6. Judgment Kocherov and Sergeyeva v. Russia, 29 March 2016.
7. Judgment Kacper Nowakowski v. Poland, 10 January 2017.
8. Case Bondavalli v. Italy, Application No. 35532/12, Judgment of 17 November 2015, ECtHR.
9. Judgment Lyubenova v. Bulgaria, 18 October 2011.
10. Law No. 18, dated 23.02.2017, “On the Rights and Protection of the Child,” published in the Official Gazette No. 43, dated 9 March 2017.



