Trajtimi i anomalisë së klasës së III shoqëruar me kafshim të kryqëzuar anterior dhe kanin të impaktuar. Rast klinik.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55312/op.v14i2.4739Abstract
Class III discrepancy has been a therapeutic challenge due to the fact that its management seeks not only the correction of the malocclusion but also the aesthetic component of the patient which is affected by the severity of the malocclusion. Likewise, anterior crossbites are characteristic of skeletal, dental and even functional class III malocclusions and may prevent sagittal maxillary development in growing patients Mthus becoming a skeletal anomaly. It is important to intercept this malocclusion as early as possible in order to prevent it from transforming into a true discrepancy. This case report discusses the intervention of a Class III malocclusion in order to change the sagittal and vertical position of the incisors, to guide and maintain the remaining growth stable in a 15-year-old patient who had no previously received orthodontic treatment.Keywords:
Anterior cross bite,, class III malocclusion,, impacted canine,, prognated mandible,, low-friction bracesDownloads
References
-
Ackerman MB, Ackerman JL. Smile analysis and design in the digital era. J Clin Orthod. 2002 Apr;36(4):221-36.
-
Al-Sehaibany F and White G. “A three dimensional clinical approach for anterior crossbite treatment in early mixed dentition using an Ultrablock appliance: case report”. The journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 23.1 (1998):1-7
-
Tsai H H. “Components of anterior crossbite in the primary dentition”. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children 68.1 (2001): 27-32
-
Jirgensone I., et al. “Anterior crossbite correction in primary and mixed dentition with removable inclined plane (Bruckl appliance).” Stomatologija 10.4 (2008): 140-144.
-
Alfaifi A.H. Restorative Management and Treatment of Pseudo-Class III Malocclusion. Case Rep. Dent. 2021;2021:8470222. doi: 10.1155/2021/8470222. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
-
9. Kale B., Buyukcavus M.H. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Soft-Tissue Evaluations between Skeletal and Pseudo-Class III Malocclusions. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:14717. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020- 71772-7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
-
10. Patianna A.G., Ballini A., Meneghello M., Cantore S., Inchingolo A.M., Dipalma G., Inchingolo A.D., Inchingolo F., Malcangi G., Lucchese A., et al. Comparison of Conventional Orthognathic Surgery and “Surgery-First” Protocol: A New Weapon against Time. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents. 2019;33:59–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-
11. Adina S., Dipalma G., Bordea I.R., Lucaciu O., Feurdean C., Inchingolo A.D., Septimiu R., Malcangi G., Cantore S., Martin D., et al. Orthopedic Joint Stability Influences Growth and Maxillary Development: Clinical Aspects. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents. 2020;34:747–756. doi: 10.23812/20-204-E-52. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
-
12. Cardarelli F., Patano A., Montenegro V., Malcangi G., Coloccia G., Inchingolo A.D., Marinelli G., Laudadio C., Dipalma G., Di Venere D., et al. Elastodontic therapy un nuovo approccio alla terapia ortodontica funzionale. Il Dent. Mod. 2021;10:48–63. [Google Scholar]
-
13. Fabozzi F.F., Nucci L., Correra A., d’Apuzzo F., Franchi L., Perillo L. Comparison of Two Protocols for Early Treatment of Dentoskeletal Class III Malocclusion: Modified SEC III versus RME/FM. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 2021;24:344–350. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12440. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
-
14. Mora Martínez M.A., Pesqueira Melgarejo R., Hernández Espinosa G., De Silva Dávila J.L., Rodríguez Chávez J.A. Alteración dentofacial clase III tratado con camuflaje: Reporte de caso clínico. Rev. Mex. Ortod. 2015;3:62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.rmo.2016.03.017. [CrossRef] [Google
-
Scholar]
-
15. Farronato M., Maspero C., Abate A., Grippaudo C., Connelly S.T., Tartaglia G.M. 3D Cephalometry on Reduced FOV CBCT: Skeletal Class Assessment through AF-BF on Frankfurt Plane—Validity and Reliability through Comparison with 2D Measurements. Eur. Radiol. 2020;30:6295–
-
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06905-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
References
Ackerman MB, Ackerman JL. Smile analysis and design in the digital era. J Clin Orthod. 2002 Apr;36(4):221-36.
Al-Sehaibany F and White G. “A three dimensional clinical approach for anterior crossbite treatment in early mixed dentition using an Ultrablock appliance: case report”. The journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 23.1 (1998):1-7
Tsai H H. “Components of anterior crossbite in the primary dentition”. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children 68.1 (2001): 27-32
Jirgensone I., et al. “Anterior crossbite correction in primary and mixed dentition with removable inclined plane (Bruckl appliance).” Stomatologija 10.4 (2008): 140-144.
Alfaifi A.H. Restorative Management and Treatment of Pseudo-Class III Malocclusion. Case Rep. Dent. 2021;2021:8470222. doi: 10.1155/2021/8470222. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Kale B., Buyukcavus M.H. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Soft-Tissue Evaluations between Skeletal and Pseudo-Class III Malocclusions. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:14717. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020- 71772-7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Patianna A.G., Ballini A., Meneghello M., Cantore S., Inchingolo A.M., Dipalma G., Inchingolo A.D., Inchingolo F., Malcangi G., Lucchese A., et al. Comparison of Conventional Orthognathic Surgery and “Surgery-First” Protocol: A New Weapon against Time. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents. 2019;33:59–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Adina S., Dipalma G., Bordea I.R., Lucaciu O., Feurdean C., Inchingolo A.D., Septimiu R., Malcangi G., Cantore S., Martin D., et al. Orthopedic Joint Stability Influences Growth and Maxillary Development: Clinical Aspects. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents. 2020;34:747–756. doi: 10.23812/20-204-E-52. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Cardarelli F., Patano A., Montenegro V., Malcangi G., Coloccia G., Inchingolo A.D., Marinelli G., Laudadio C., Dipalma G., Di Venere D., et al. Elastodontic therapy un nuovo approccio alla terapia ortodontica funzionale. Il Dent. Mod. 2021;10:48–63. [Google Scholar]
13. Fabozzi F.F., Nucci L., Correra A., d’Apuzzo F., Franchi L., Perillo L. Comparison of Two Protocols for Early Treatment of Dentoskeletal Class III Malocclusion: Modified SEC III versus RME/FM. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 2021;24:344–350. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12440. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Mora Martínez M.A., Pesqueira Melgarejo R., Hernández Espinosa G., De Silva Dávila J.L., Rodríguez Chávez J.A. Alteración dentofacial clase III tratado con camuflaje: Reporte de caso clínico. Rev. Mex. Ortod. 2015;3:62–69. doi: 10.1016/j.rmo.2016.03.017. [CrossRef] [Google
Scholar]
15. Farronato M., Maspero C., Abate A., Grippaudo C., Connelly S.T., Tartaglia G.M. 3D Cephalometry on Reduced FOV CBCT: Skeletal Class Assessment through AF-BF on Frankfurt Plane—Validity and Reliability through Comparison with 2D Measurements. Eur. Radiol. 2020;30:6295–
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06905-7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Shqip
English
Italiano
