Recognizing civil law principles and implementation

Authors

  • Erjona Bezatlliu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55312/op.vi2.6166

Abstract

Civil law, as a fundamental pillar of legal systems around the world, embodies a set of principles and practices aimed at resolving disputes and regulating social interactions. At its core, civil law emphasizes the protection of individual rights and the resolution of grievances through a structured legal framework. At the heart of this framework are principles such as the rule of law, which ensures that laws are applied equally to all citizens, and the presumption of innocence, which protects individuals from arbitrary deprivation of liberty. In addition, civil law prioritizes the resolution of disputes through peaceful means, often through adjudication by impartial courts or alternative dispute resolution mechanisms such as mediation and arbitration. Civil law enforcement involves a multifaceted approach that includes legislative acts, judicial interpretation, and executive enforcement. Legislatures draft and promulgate statutes that articulate rights, duties, and procedures, while the judiciary interprets these laws and applies them in specific cases. The executive branch plays a crucial role in implementing court decisions and ensuring compliance with legal mandates. Civil law systems vary across jurisdictions, reflecting unique historical, cultural, and institutional contexts. Common law countries, such as the United States and the United Kingdom, rely heavily on judicial precedents, while civil law jurisdictions, such as those in continental Europe, favor codified statutes. However, the core principles of justice, equality, and access to justice underpin civil justice systems globally. In conclusion, understanding civil law requires familiarity with its guiding principles and the complex mechanisms by which these principles are implemented.

Keywords:

civil rights, legal, defense, judiciary, mechanisms

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Erjona Bezatlliu

Fakuleti i Drejtësisë, Universiteti i Tiranës

References

  1. Andrews, N. (2012). Fundamental principles of civil procedure: Order out of chaos. Civil litigation in a globalising world, 19-38.

  2. Apple, J. G., & Deyling, R. P. (1995). A primer on the civil-law system. Federal Judicial Center.

  3. Basser, L. A., & Jones, M. (2011). Fostering inclusive societal values through law. In Children’s Rights: Progress and Perspectives (pp. 218-252). Brill Nijhoff.

  4. Brand, P. A., Brand, P., & Getzler, J. (Eds.). (2012). Judges and Judging in the History of the Common Law and Civil Law: From Antiquity to Modern Times. Cambridge University Press.

  5. Breen, Q. (1943). Justinian’s Corpus Juris Civilis. Or. L. Rev., 23, 219.

  6. Carbonnier, D. (2014). Le Comité protestant de propagande française à l’étranger (1915-1927). Bulletin de la Société de l’Histoire du Protestantisme Français (1903-), 185-217.

  7. Caserta, S. (2020). Digitalization of the legal field and the future of large law firms. Laws, 9(2), 14.

  8. Coing, H. (1973). Handbuch der Quellen und Literatur der neueren europäischen Privatrechtsgeschichte (Vol. 1). Munich: Beck.

  9. Daci, J. (2010). Legal Principles, Legal Values and Legal Norms: are they the same or different?. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 1(02), 109-115.

  10. Fox, J. (2000). Civil society and political accountability: propositions for discussion. Santa Cruz, University of California (mimeo.), 1-24.

  11. Harmathy, A. (2019). Changes in the Legal System: A Comparative Essay Based on the Hungarian Experience. J. Civ. L. Stud., 12, 217.

  12. Hinings, *B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and organization, 28(1), 52-61.

  13. Khamitovich, V. D., & Gaptraufovich, N. A. (2019). Digitization of law: Some problematic aspects. J. Pol. & L., 12, 135.

  14. Lesaffer, R. (2009). European legal history: a cultural and political perspective. Cambridge University Press.

  15. Lessig, L. (1999). The law of the horse: What cyber law might teach. Harv. L. Rev., 113, 501.

  16. Luhmann, N. (2004). Law as a social system. Oxford socio-legal studies.

  17. Lukyantsev, A. (2015). On modern Civil law in Russia in the system of private law. Terra Economicus, 13(3), 147-155.

  18. MacCormick, N. (1998). The significance of precedent. Acta Juridica, 174.

  19. Mack, O. (2021). What Is E-contract and Is It Legally Binding. Parley Pro.

  20. Mousourakis, G. (2015). Roman law and the origins of the civil law tradition (pp. 221-224). Berlin: Springer.

  21. Schmoeckel, M. (2008). Rechtsgeschichte der Wirtschaft: seit dem 19. Jahrhundert. Mohr Siebeck.

  22. Stein, P. G. (1991). Roman law, common law, and civil law. Tul. L. Rev., 66, 1591.

  23. Weatherill, S. (2010). The ‘principles of civil law’as a basis for interpreting the legislative acquis.

  24. Zivkovska, R., & Przeska, T. (2014). Codification of Civil Law. Collection Papers Fac. L. Nis, 68, 251.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-20

How to Cite

Bezatlliu, E. (2024). Recognizing civil law principles and implementation. Optime, (2), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.55312/op.vi2.6166

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories