Dynamic psycholinguistics : The impact of the social interaction system in the individual psycholinguistic prototype

Authors

  • Silva Ibrahimi
  • Vera Ostreni
  • Elisabeta Kafia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55312/op.vi2.4636

Abstract

Speaking is a cognitive - motor activity apparently simple, which differentiates men from other animals and is made possible by a vast network of cerebral, cortical and subcortical structures. Language implies the relationship of the human being to his world while Psycholinguistics is the dynamic language process that leads to a mutual connection with the world external and with the other, which is other than self. In the history of Albanian psycho-pedagogical thinking there are evidences that reveal the efforts and contributions to understand and interpret the phenomena and problems directly related to the development and education of students of different school ages. The discussion of complex linguistic topics, communication and relationships is related not only to the exhaustion of the definition, but also the ability to take into consideration the circumstances that make them a social-ethnic reference system with the contribution of main references such as linguistic psychology, philosophy of language, linguistics and semiotics, cognitive level analysis and phenomenological aspects in a daily dimension, but also in the form of meanings, concept of reciprocity, social connotation and the dynamic process in the whole.

Keywords:

psycholinguistics, communication, psycho-pedagogical thinking, education of psycho-linguistic construct.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Gecas, V. dhe Burke, P. J. (1995). Self and Identity. Gjendur në Comparing psychological and sociological approaches to identity: identity status, identity capital and the individualization process, Cote’ E. James dhe Schwartz J. Seith, Journal of Adolescence, 2002, 25, fq. 572-586 www.ideallibrary.com

  2. House, R. J. (1977). ‘A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership’, Gjendur në J.G. Hunt and L.L. Larsen (eds), Leadership: The Cutting Edge. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

  3. Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, fq. 551-558.

  4. Freud S. (1932), Introduzione alla psicoanalisi (nuova serie di lezioni). Gjendur në Veprat/ Opere, botimi italian, vol. 11, Boringhieri, Torino 1979, fq. 121-284 referuar Freud 1920.

  5. Caligor, E.dhe Clarkin, J. F. (2010). An object relations model of personality and personality pathology. Gjendur në J. F. Clarkin, P. Fonagy, dhe G. O. Gabbard (Eds.), Psychodynamic psychotherapy for personality disorders. A clinical handbook (fq. 3–35). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

  6. Kernberg, O. F. dhe Caligor, E. Levy. (2005). A psychoanalytic theory of personality disorders. Gjendur në J. F. Clarkin & M. F. Lenzenweger (Eds.), Major theories of personality disorder (Botimi i dytë, fq. 114–156). New York: Guilford.

  7. McWilliams, N. (2011). The Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual: An effort to compensate for the limitations of descriptive psychiatric diagnosis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(2), fq. 112–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.542709

  8. Koeelen JA, Luyten P, Eurelings Bontekoe LH, Diguer L, Vermote R, Lowyck B dhe Bühring ME. (2012). The impact of level of personality organization on treatment response: a systematic review. Psychiatry, 75(4), fq. 355-374.

  9. Blatt, S. J., Stayner, D., Auerbach, J. S. dhe Behrends, R. S. (1996). Change in object and self representation in longterm, intensive, inpatient treatment of seriously disturbed adolescents and young adults. Psychiatry, 59, fq. 82-107.

  10. Livesley, W. J. (2003-2004). Practical management of personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.

  11. Skodol, AE dhe Bender DS. (2003). Why are women diagnosed borderline more than men? The Psychiatric Quarterly. 74(4), fq. 349–360.

  12. Blatt, S. J. dhe Luyten, P. (2009). A structural-developmental psychodynamic approach to psychopathology: Two polarities

  13. of experience across the life span. Development and Psychopathology, 21, fq. 793–814.

  14. Blatt, S. J.dhe Shichman, S. (1983). Two primary configurations of psychopathology. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 6, 187-254.

  15. Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C., dhe EubanksCarter, C (2011)Repairing alliance ruptures , Psychotherapy, 48(1), 80-87.

  16. Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C., Samstag, L. W., dhe Stevens, C. (2002). Repairing alliance ruptures II. Gjendur në J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work. New York, NY: Oxford University.

  17. Heidegger, M. (1976). Essere e Tempo. Botimi i njëmbëdhjetë, fq. 27, fq. 42, fq. 128, fq. 182 (A cura di Pietro Chiodi) Longanesi & C., Milano.

  18. Gazzillo, F., Gordon, R.M., Lingiardi,V., Del Corno, F., Bornstein, R. F., McWilliams, N. (2014). Empirical research with Psychodynamic

  19. Diagnostic Prototype (PDP) and the Psychodiagnostic Chart (PDC): Towards PDM-2. National Meeting of American Psychoanalytic Association,

  20. New York, fq. 14–19.

  21. Humbolt W. von. (2000). La diversità delle lingue, Roma-Bari, Laterza.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-25

How to Cite

Ibrahimi, S., Ostreni , V., & Kafia, E. (2024). Dynamic psycholinguistics : The impact of the social interaction system in the individual psycholinguistic prototype. Optime, (2), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.55312/op.vi2.4636

Issue

No. 2 (2018): Optime

Section

Shkenca Shoqërore

Categories